Powered By Blogger

Wednesday, March 9, 2011


Photo for Pushe esther Egbe








How applicable is the ethnic in Nigeria
 
 
One of the distinguishing features of human being is that he is endowed
with free will from creation. He is therefore free to act in which ever way he
desire. However, as a social being, he is expected to align his values with
those of the society where he operates. As such, ethical codes are designed
to restrict his actions to the accepted norms in the society. Thus, even when
you have free will to act in whatever way that suits you, there are certain
sets of norms that are expected to guide you in whatever actions you want to
take. Consequently, in performing their duties, journalists are expected to
obey certain rules and regulations that bind members of the profession. This
chapter therefore, takes a look at media and ethics and problems facing the
Nigerian journalists.
WHAT IS ETHICS?
Merill (1982), defines ethics as the branch of philosophy which aids in
determining what is right to do. That is, ethics is a study of right conduct.
Lagos Papers in English Studies Vol. 1: 58-68 (2007)
59 July - 2007
Its ultimate concern is how to provide moral principles or norms for action.
It could therefore be termed a normative science of conduct. Because of its
concern with such concepts as virtue and vice, right and wrong, good and
bad, responsible and irresponsible actions, a study of ethics is a study of
rules and guidelines designed to regulate human actions while making
moral decisions.
ORIGIN OF ETHICS
The concept of ethics dates back to the beginning of existence. However, the
earliest sign of ethics in journalism was noticed at the turn of the twentieth
century when there was a reaction to the excesses of the freedom of the
Libertarian press system. This abuse led to calls for a free but responsible
press. In other words, the social responsibility believes that:
• Certain obligations to society should be accepted and fulfilled by the
press.
• These obligations are mainly to be fulfilled through setting high
professional standards of trust, accuracy, objectivity, balance and in
formativeness.
• In the discharge of their duties, the media should be self-regulating
within the framework of law and established institutions.
• The society and public have a right to expect high standards of
performance from the media, and intervention can be justified to
secure the public since journalists should be accountable to society.
To ensure high standard, the theory holds that the press must be controlled
by itself or by the government. Thus, Merill (1982) describes journalistic
ethics as a branch of philosophy, which aids journalists in determining what
is right to do. It is ultimately concerned with providing moral principles or
norms for journalistic actions. To understand the full meaning of ethics in
journalism, Okunna (1997) asks:
• What standards should journalists adhere to in the practice of their
profession?
• What is good journalism and what is bad journalism?
• What should the journalist do in a particular situation?
• What should journalism do for its practitioners, its audience and the
society?
Judged from the above questions, the purpose of ethnics in Mass
Communication is to assist journalist to be more moral professionals.
Journalistic ethics will stipulate rules, norms and principles that would
guide the journalists in making moral decisions.
CODES OF JOURNALISTIC ETHICS
Codes of journalistic ethics can be defined as rules and norms, which are
prepared and adopted by journalists to regulate the conduct of their
profession. Professional ethical norms first began to be codified in the early
1920 and at present these codes exist in some ninety countries in all regions
of the world. (Macbride et al 1981).
Lagos Papers in English Studies Vol. 1: 58-68 (2007)
60 July - 2007
These codes exist at international, regional and national levels. However, it
is important to note that, no matter that part of the world or at what level
journalistic codes of conduct are adopted, there are remarkable similarities
in the ideas, or standards of conduct and the basic tenet which are
advocated by the different codes. As pointed out by (Okunna 1997) there are
certain fundamental journalistic principles applicable in all regions of the
world. These include truthfulness. Refusal of bribes, avoidance of
plagiarism, confidentiality of sources. People’s right to privacy, correction
and rectification of incorrect report.
INSTITUTIONAL CODES
Also, different media organizations have their own policies regarding the
conduct of employees. These codes are often comprehensive and deal with
such diverse matters as the acceptance of gifts and other gratuities from
outside sources, conflict or interests, the use of offensive, or indecent
materials, the publication of rape victims’ names, the staging of news
events, the use of deceptive news gathering techniques, and the
identification of sources. There are usually similar policies regarding
advertising contents, particularly in matters of decency and taste.
Although these codes often reflect an organization’s commitment of certain
standards of conduct, they are sometimes criticized for failing to provide
guidance for the myriad of ethical dilemmas hat confront media
practitioners under the pressure of time deadlines. Nevertheless, such codes
are helpful in socialization of new employees to the ethical values of the
organization and can be used as neutral standards to which both sides can
appeal in an ethical dispute.
The violation of the codes may earn employee sanction from the
organization. Also, each violation, particularly if ignored by media executives
erodes the integrity of their media.
CODE OF ETHICS FOR NIGERIA JOURNALISTS
In Nigeria, code of ethics for journalists was first established and adopted by
the Nigeria Press Organization (NPO) in 1979. This code later paved way for
a new one which is currently in existence.
The process fore the emergence of the new code began in March 1996, when
the press council held a national workshop in Ota, Ogun State in
collaboration with the Nigerian Union of Journalists (NUJ) and the Nigerian
Guild of Editors (NGE). The amended code was adopted by the central
working committee of the NUJ in an in-house conference held in Abuja,
shortly after the Ota workshop.
The Nigerian Press Council (NPC) finally organized the Ilorin forum, from
March 18-20 1998 where the NPO made up of NUJ, NGE and Newspaper
Lagos Papers in English Studies Vol. 1: 58-68 (2007)
61 July - 2007
Proprietors Association of Nigeria formally ratified and gave impetus for the
implementation of the new code.
The new code, is a collective effort of Nigerian journalists represented by the
Nigeria Press Organization (NPO) and the Nigerian Press Council (NPC). The
letter is expected to interpret the code, acting as an adjudicator when any of
the provisions of the code is breached. Titled “Code of Ethics for Nigerian
Journalists”, it contains fifteen provisions as published by the Nigerian
Press Council. They are:
1. EDITORIAL INDEPENDENCE
Decisions concerning the content of news should be the
responsibility of a professional journalist.
2. ACCURACY AND FAIRNESS
i. The public has a right to know. Factual, accurate, balance
and fair reporting is the ultimate objective of good journalism
and the basis of earning public trust and confidence.
ii. A journalist should refrain from publishing inaccurate and
misleading information. Where such information has been
inadvertently published, prompt correction should be made.
A journalist must hold the right of reply as a cardinal rule of
practice.
iii. In the course of his duties, a journalist should strive to
separate facts from conjecture and comment.
3. PRIVACY
As a general rules, a journalist should respect the privacy of
individuals and their families unless it affects public interest.
i. Information on the private life of an individual; or his family
should only be published if it impinges on public interest.
ii. Publishing of such information about an individual as
mentioned above should be deemed justifiable only if it is
directed at:
• Exposing anti-social misdemeanour;
• Exposing anti-social conduct;
• Protecting public health, morality and safety;
• Preventing the public from being misled by some
statement or actions of the individual concerned.
4. PRIVILEGE/NON-DISCLOSURE
i. A journalist should observe the universally accepted
principle of confidentiality and should not disclose the source
of information obtained in confidence.
ii. A journalist should not breach an agreement with a source of
information obtained as “off-the-record” or as “background
information”.
5. DECENCY
i. A journalist should dress and comport himself in a manner
that conforms to public taste.
ii. Journalists should refrain from using offensive, abusive or
vulgar language.
Lagos Papers in English Studies Vol. 1: 58-68 (2007)
62 July - 2007
iii. A journalist should not present lurid details either in words
or picture, of violence, sexual acts, and abhorrent or horrid
scenes.
iv. In cases involving personal grief or shock, enquiries should
be carried out and approaches made with sympathy and
discretion.
v. Unless it is in the furtherance of the public’s right to know a
journalist should generally avoid identifying relatives or
friends of persons convicted or accused of rime.
6. DISCRIMINATION
A journalist should refrain from making pejorative reference to
person’s ethic group, religion, sex, or to any physical or mental
illness or handicap.
7. REWARDS AND GRATIFICATION
i. A journalist should neither solicit nor accept bribe,
gratification or patronage to suppress or publish information.
ii. To demand payment for the publication of news is inimical to
the notion of news as a fair, accurate, unbiased and factual
report of an event.
8. VIOLENCE
A journalist should not present or report act of violence, armed
robberies terrorist activities or vulgar display of wealth in a manner
that glorifies such acts in the eyes of public.
9. CHILDREN AND MINOR
A journalist should not identify, either by name or picture, or
interview children under the age of 16 who are involved in cases
concerning sexual offences, crimes and rituals or witchcraft either
as victims, witnesses or defendants.
10. ACCESS TO INFORMATION
A journalist should strive to employ open and honest means in the
gathering of information.
Exceptional methods may be employed only when the public
interest is at stake.
11. PUBLIC INTEREST
A journalist should strive to enhance national unity and public
good.
12. SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY
A journalist should promote universal principles of human rights,
democracy, justice, equity, peace and international understanding.
13. PLAGIARISM
A journalist should not copy, wholesale or in part, other people’s
work without attribution and/or consent.
14. COPYRIGHT
i. Where a journalist reproduced a work, be it in print,
broadcast, artwork or deign, proper acknowledgement should
e accorded the author.
ii. A journalist should abide by all rules of copyrighting,
established by national and international laws and
conventions.
Lagos Papers in English Studies Vol. 1: 58-68 (2007)
63 July - 2007
15. PRESS FREEDOM OF CODE OF ETHICS
A journalist should strive at all times to enhance press freedom
and responsibility.
ENFORCEMENT OF CODE OF ETHICS
Jakande (1989) observed that the enforcement of professional ethics in
journalism can be effected by the professional bodies, media houses and the
public. Besides, the role of the press council cannot be over emphasized.
The Nigerian Press Council is an autonomous body set up by Decree No of
1992 and amended by Decree No 60 of 1990 to promote high professional
standards for the Nigerian Press, and to deal with complaints emanating
from members of the public about the conduct of the journalists in their
professional capacity or complaints from press about the conduct of persons
or organizations towards the press.
The NPC decree provides it with a wide range of responsibilities to wit:
- Enquire into complaints about the press and the conduct of
any person or organization towards the press.
- Research into contemporary press development and engage
in updating press documentation.
- Review development likely to restrict the flow of information
and advice on means aimed at remedying such development.
- Ensure the protection of the rights and privileges of
journalists in the lawful performance of their professional
duties and
- Foster the achievement and maintenance of high professional
standards by the Nigerian press.
In the submission on the limitations of the Nigerian press council. Bako
(2000) believes that the decrees establishing the Nigerian press council have
not met the acceptable standards of self-regulatory mechanism, pointing out
that such provisions impede on press freedom as enshrined in the 1999
constitution and other international human rights instrument.
ETHICAL DILEMMA IN NIGERIAN JOURNALISM
Despite the introduction of code of ethic for Nigerian journalists and the
setting of the Nigerian Press Council, there are other ethical issues, which
are part of the overall problems in the society. These include sycophancy.
Character assassination pressure, Afghanistan, bribery, moonlighting,
sensationalism, self-censorship, plagiarism, advertorial, deception and
faking stories among others.
SYCHOPHANCY
A sycophant is a “person who tries to win favour by flattering rich or
powerful people”. Such excessive and insincere praise is a common ethical
problem in journalism. According to (Okunna (1997)), the sycophant
journalist flatters political leaders, wealthy citizens and owners of media
houses who are employers and have formidable powers over journalists.
This is more glaring in the political sphere. For, majority of the mass media
Lagos Papers in English Studies Vol. 1: 58-68 (2007)
64 July - 2007
in Nigeria, and in many Third World countries, are owned by the
government and as a result the media more often than not are praise singing
the activities of government officials and government policies.
During election, sycophancy leads to the abuse of the power of the mass
media, and unethical journalists use the media to confer status and
legitimacy on their favourite politicians.
Writing on 126 years of the Nigerian press in Newswatch special edition of
October, 1985, Olatunji Dare noted that “between 1979 and 1983, many a
journalist sold his souls and his craft to the highest political bidder or
indeed to anyone who put up the bid”. Without exception, he observed,
“government owned newspapers became organs of whatever political party
seemed likely to control the state in which they were published or the
centre”.
Cases of sycophancy by Nigerian journalists again became glaring in the
present political dispensation, to the extent that the Nigerian Broadcasting
Commission (NBC) on May 29, 2001 had to warn ten erring broadcasting
stations to desist from “furthering the political views of the owner state
government to the detriment of opposition views, thereby mortgaging public
trust as well as confidence of citizenry (Media Rights monitor: 2001). This
practice denies the public the correct information, which is the duty of the
journalist to give them.
CHARACTER ASSASSINATION
Closely related to sycophancy is the ethical problems of character
assassination. While flattering favoured prominent and powerful people, the
sycophant journalist could indulge in verifying the opponents of such
people.
When the press makes statement that damages a person’s reputation, the
press is guilty of character assassination. An example of character
assassination was late Ohonbamu’s accusation of the former Head of State,
late Murtala Muhammed of corruption and acquisition of ill-gotten wealth.
Ohonbamu, a Senior lecturer in Law at the University of Lagos and also the
publisher of African Spark magazine published the allegation in his
magazine. He was charged to court and towards the end of the trial he
pleaded guilty. He was verbally reprimanded and set free (Uche: 1989). Also,
the recent statement credited to Dr. Gbenga Obasnjo published by The News
magazine accusing Vice President Abubakar Atiku of corruption is another
case of character assassination. Whereas there is no legal punishment for
sycophancy, character assassination is both unethical and illegal, a
journalist could face court action for defamation or damaging somebody’s
reputation.
PRESSURE
Pressure is any force or influence, which causes a journalist to feel strongly
compelled to act in a manner desirable to the source of each force or
influence. This can be internal or external. Internal pressure emanates from
Lagos Papers in English Studies Vol. 1: 58-68 (2007)
65 July - 2007
within the organization in which the journalist works. The Publishers of a
newspaper, for instance, could pressurize an editor to write an editorial
written by the publisher or his surrogate. As a journalist in Daily Times
during the Abacha regime, it was observed that some editorials published by
the newspaper emanated from the minister of information’s office in Abuja.
External pressure, on the other hand, comes from the wider community or
society. These range from advertisers, politicians, or even friends and
families of journalists can constitute sources of this type or pressure.
Pressure can cause a journalist to be irresponsible or unethical if the source
of the pressure compels the journalist to carry out action that are contrary
to his/her ethical principles.
AFGHANISTANISM
This is the practice of writing about far-away issues while shying away from
tackling the problems at home. It originally applied to editorial writing but
had come to be applied to all forms of journalistic writings. Dare (2000)
points out that during the Buhari era, commentators and analysts took to
Afghanistanism, writing earnestly and candidly about tyranny and human
rights violations in virtually every spot on the globe except Nigeria. He
however added that all those other places were simply a metaphor for
Nigeria. Afghanistanism can be as a result of fear or lack of courage. Since
charity should begin at home, if the mass media shy away from tackling
Serious local or national problems by pre-occupying themselves with
Harmless discussions of issues which are largely irrelevant to a majority of
Their audience, then the journalists who work in these media is
Irresponsible and unethical, failing in their duty which the society expects
them to perform with courage and dedication.
BRIBERY
In journalism, the ethical problem of materialism is manifested in the form
of bribery and acceptance of gifts. In the course if their duties, some
journalists usually accept money and other non-monetary gifts. These
might compromise their integrity and that of their respective media
organizations.
In Nigeria, the commonest type of bribe in journalism is the so-called brown
envelope which is a monetary bribe handed out to unethical journalists to
pressurize him or her into doing what the giver wants. Once accepted,
monetary bribes and other gifts tie the hands of journalist who then
becomes incapable of being objective in reporting events and issues
involving people who give the gifts. Also, some publishers are in the habit of
getting contracts from the government, such publishers always try to
discourage their newspapers and magazine from publishing stones hat are
critical of the government.
Objectivity is thus first casually in reporting when journalist succumb to the
evils of materialism as they attempt to please people whose bribes they have
accepted.
Lagos Papers in English Studies Vol. 1: 58-68 (2007)
66 July - 2007
SENSATIONALISM
When a newspaper or nay other mass media presents news in a way
designed to arouse a quick and excited reaction, it is said to be guilty to
sensationalism. This type of reaction is evoked when a newspaper, for
instance, seizes on the most sordid disgusting aspect to play up in its new
story. Some newspapers and soft well magazines deliberately encourage this
practice and thrive on it in Nigeria.
Akinfeleye (2003) cited examples of headlines that could be termed
sensational. They include “OPV vs Ijaw Youth claims Five”, “Horrow As OPC
And Ijaw Youth Clash”, “Ethnic Conflicts in Ajegunle”, “Zamfara Governor
Dares Obasanjo” and “Zamfara Goes Islamic”.
MOONLIGHTING
 
To make ends meet, journalists sometimes take two jobs, by working for
Competing employers. As Okunna puts it, ‘moonlighting’ the act of holding
two different jobs simultaneously and being paid for both creates room for
Conflict of interest and divided loyalty which constitute fertile ground for
unethical behaviour by journalists.
Again, objectivity is usually the causality of this type of situation. She point
out that if a moonlighting journalist is required to write a negative story
about his or her second employer, such a journalist may not have the
courage to carry out this assignment objectivity and responsibly.
Considering that objectivity and responsibility occupy a central position in
journalistic performance, journalists who lack these toe virtues could be
considered as having been weighted in the balance and found wanting.
SELF-CENSORSHIP
Socially irresponsibility and unprofessional, is the practice of withholding
information from viewers, listeners and readers especially during crises.
This is touted as a crisis management tactic whose advocates fail to
appreciate how much damage it does to their credibility. The Nigerian
Television Authority (NTA) and the Federal Radio Corporation of Nigeria
(FRCN) have a policy of maintaining stolid silence during crisis.
ADVERTORIAL
For many Nigerian newspapers, magazines and the NYA, advertorial, the
practice of failing to differentiate and separate advertisements from editorial
matter is a survival strategy. Ogunade (1996) noted that they do not see
anything unethical in this practice, adding the readers and the viewers are
the losers, for they no longer know where editorial matter begins and where
advertisements take over. Where payment has been specifically made for
the dissemination of news, such should be fully disclosed to its consumer.
DECEPTION
Deception covers a wide range of practices, but at its heart is not being
truthful with someone in order to get a news story. Some journalists
Lagos Papers in English Studies Vol. 1: 58-68 (2007)
67 July - 2007
practice deceit when they mis-represent themselves, go undercover or use a
hidden camera or tape recorders. For example, consumer reporters
commonly do this when they are doing price comparison. The absolutists
would say no to this method, however others would argue that there is
nothing wrong if the method is used to get information so as to correct an
abuse.
FAKERY
As observed by Ogunade (1986) one of major ethical issues confronting the
media is fakery-the publishing of false stories. According to him, only the
thoroughly unethical and unprofessional editor or reporter would knowingly
publish falsehood as Lawrence Akapa (Top News) and Bop Opene (prime
people) did. Of course, both men paid the price as the Nigerian Union of
Journalists promptly rose to the occasion, and nipped in the bud the
dangerous development by blacklisting the erring newsmen. Also, according
to The Press a publication of the NPC, several complaints of false stories
have been received and adjudicated by the council.
CONCLUSION
Bearing in mind that the society expects a great responsibility from the
journalists, it behooves on Nigerian journalists to pay attention to certain
kinds of conflicts to avoid projecting the impression that they can no longer
be trusted.
In the words of Risley (2001) when a journalist is confronted with ethical
problems he or she should consider the following principles.
- When there are two extreme positions in a situation, he or
she should seek the middle ground known by Aristotle as the
“Golden mean”.
- Act only as you would wish others would act.
- Consider the utilitarianism of our actions, that is, our action
should produce the greatest balance of good over evil.
- Apply the veil of ignorance, that is, make ethical decisions as
if you are equal with all members of the society and lastly
treat people in the same way you would expect to be treated.
Besides, stake holders in media organizations should try to improve the
welfare of and working condition of Nigerian journalists, Mohammed (1996)
adduced to this when he said that “while journalist in the west may be well
paid, insured, endowed with state of the art equipment and facilities and are
highly mobile; their Third World, and particularly Nigerian counterparts are
poorly paid, uninsured immobile and with poor working environment”. He
added that such demoralized condition tends to open them to job insecurity
and make them vulnerable to corruption and abuse of basic professional
ethics.
Lagos Papers in English Studies Vol. 1: 58-68 (2007)
68 July - 2007
REFERENCES
Akinfeleye, Ralph (2003), Fourth Estate of the Realm or Fourth Estate of the
Wreck: Imperative of Social Responsibility of the press, Lagos press pp
63-64
Bako, Samson (2000) “Limitations of the Press Council” in International
Press Centre (ed) Ethics and Regulation: formulating a working
agenda for journalists and the media, Lagos, IPC.
Dare, Olatunji (2000) “from Iwe Iroyin to ‘naijanews.com’: The Nigerian
Press 1859-1999” in Oseni Tunji (ed) Hosting the 14th Anniversary of
the Nigerian press, Lagos Tosen consult. P.32-33.
Jakande, Lateef (1989) “Enforcement of professional Ethics” in Duyile,
Dayo (ed) Journalistic Ethics. Ibadan, Ororo publications, p. 41
Media Rights monitor (2001) vol 6 No 6 p. 15
Merrill, C. John (1982): Ethics and Journalist is Merill et al (ed) Ethics and
the press: reading in Mass Media Morality, New York, Hasting House
Publishers.
Mohammed, Jubril (1996) “Ideological Parameters of Nigerian Journalism” in
Dare, O and Uyo, A (eds), Journalism in Nigeria: Issues and
Perspectives, Lagos, NUJ, pg 306.
Momoh, Tony (2003) “Codes of Conduct for Nigerian Journalists: Appraising
the old and the new” In Akinfeleye, R and Okoye I (eds) Issues in
Nigerian Media History: 1990-2000 A.D
Lagos Maithouse press Ltd, p. 15.
New Delhi, Concept publishing pg 102-105.
Newswatch special edition, Oct. 1985
Nigeria Press Organization (1998): Code of Ethics for Nigerian Journalists
Lagos, NPC. Decree No 60 of 1999.
Ogunade, Delu (1996): “The Press Responsibility and Professionalism” in
Constitutional Rights Journal, Lagos, CRD. 49-55.
Okunna, Stella (1997): Ethics of Mass Communication, Enugu, New
Generations Book pp 49-55.
Randall, D (2000): The Universal journalist 2nd (ed) London, Pluto Press.
Risely, Ford (2001) “Ethics” in Harpler Christopher and the Indiana group
(eds) Journalism 2000 Madison, Course wise.
The news Vol 2 No 1
The Press Vol 3 pp. 36-45.
Uche, Luke (1989) Mass Media People and Politics in Nigeria.
 

No comments:

Post a Comment